SCOTUS considers law prohibiting gender-affirming care—case of constitutionality, deep cultural division

SCOTUS considers law prohibiting gender-affirming care—case of constitutionality, deep cultural division

U.S. Supreme Court The culture wars come to the Supreme Court Dec. 4 when it hears oral arguments in United States v. Skrmetti, which involves the constitutionality of a Tennessee law that... Read more »
One justice was ‘especially vocal’ in opposition to enforcement mechanism for SCOTUS ethics code, report says

One justice was ‘especially vocal’ in opposition to enforcement mechanism for SCOTUS ethics code, report says

Home Daily News One justice was ‘especially vocal’ in opposition… U.S. Supreme Court One justice was ‘especially vocal’ in opposition to enforcement mechanism for SCOTUS ethics code, report says By Debra Cassens... Read more »
Is racism against whites ‘edgy and exciting’? Potential SCOTUS pick pens dissent supporting bullied student

Is racism against whites ‘edgy and exciting’? Potential SCOTUS pick pens dissent supporting bullied student

Home Daily News Is racism against whites ‘edgy and exciting’?… Education Law Is racism against whites ‘edgy and exciting’? Potential SCOTUS pick pens dissent supporting bullied student By Debra Cassens Weiss November... Read more »
Is racism against whites ‘edgy and exciting’? Potential SCOTUS pick pens dissent supporting bullied student

Is racism against whites ‘edgy and exciting’? Potential SCOTUS pick pens dissent supporting bullied student

Home Daily News Is racism against whites ‘edgy and exciting’?… Education Law Is racism against whites ‘edgy and exciting’? Potential SCOTUS pick pens dissent supporting bullied student By Debra Cassens Weiss November... Read more »
2nd Circuit sticks to its guns on constitutionality of concealed-carry law after SCOTUS remand

2nd Circuit sticks to its guns on constitutionality of concealed-carry law after SCOTUS remand

Home Daily News 2nd Circuit sticks to its guns on constitutionality… Second Amendment 2nd Circuit sticks to its guns on constitutionality of concealed-carry law after SCOTUS remand By Debra Cassens Weiss October... Read more »
2nd Circuit sticks to its guns on constitutionality of concealed-carry law after SCOTUS remand

2nd Circuit sticks to its guns on constitutionality of concealed-carry law after SCOTUS remand

Home Daily News 2nd Circuit sticks to its guns on constitutionality… Second Amendment 2nd Circuit sticks to its guns on constitutionality of concealed-carry law after SCOTUS remand By Debra Cassens Weiss October... Read more »
SCOTUS immunity decision may have protected crimes in Nixon White House, 9th Circuit judge says

SCOTUS immunity decision may have protected crimes in Nixon White House, 9th Circuit judge says

Home Daily News SCOTUS immunity decision may have protected… U.S. Supreme Court SCOTUS immunity decision may have protected crimes in Nixon White House, 9th Circuit judge says By Debra Cassens Weiss October... Read more »
SCOTUS immunity decision may have protected crimes in Nixon White House, 9th Circuit judge says

SCOTUS immunity decision may have protected crimes in Nixon White House, 9th Circuit judge says

Home Daily News SCOTUS immunity decision may have protected… U.S. Supreme Court SCOTUS immunity decision may have protected crimes in Nixon White House, 9th Circuit judge says By Debra Cassens Weiss October... Read more »
SCOTUS dispatch: in oral arguments, several justices lean against giving mifepristone opponents standing to sue FDA – JURIST

SCOTUS dispatch: in oral arguments, several justices lean against giving mifepristone opponents standing to sue FDA – JURIST

Marissa Zupancic is JURIST’s Washington DC Correspondent, a JURIST Senior Editor and a 3L at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. She’s stationed in Washington during her Semester in DC. Today I... Read more »
SCOTUS dispatch: ‘in the room where it happened’ for the oral arguments in the Trump v. Anderson ballot disqualification case – JURIST

SCOTUS dispatch: ‘in the room where it happened’ for the oral arguments in the Trump v. Anderson ballot disqualification case – JURIST

Marissa Zupancic is JURIST’s Washington DC Correspondent, a JURIST Senior Editor, and a 3L at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. She’s stationed in Washington during her Semester in DC.  On... Read more »
Home Privacy Policy Terms Of Use Anti Spam Policy Contact Us Affiliate Disclosure DMCA Earnings Disclaimer